- First Name
- Bob
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2024
- Threads
- 20
- Messages
- 575
- Reaction score
- 342
- Location
- Wivenhoe999
- Vehicles
- Macan 4S
I hope so - mine is scheduled for mid July.Huge improvement over the ICE version IMHO.
Sponsored
I hope so - mine is scheduled for mid July.Huge improvement over the ICE version IMHO.
Thanks!@byebye
I feel for you.
You definitely had a lemon. Should have forced them to take it back or swap to a new one.
Which EV are you considering next?
Iād appreciate your view of it versus the Macan - I optioned up a Macan 4s with the same options on my order for the Cayenne EV Coupe base - the Cayenne was just Ā£ 3k more.I have a high tolerance for risk. I configured and ordered my 2024 Macan 4 in June 2024, purchasing it upon delivery in December 2024. The first six months went well, and so we bought a second (CPO) for my wife In June 2025. We will keep these for 4-6 more years; might move back to a Cayenne then, but too soon to decide that.
As an aside, I got an invite from my Porsche dealer to visit them this weekend to see the Cayenne EV. Will be doing that just to check it out.
I'm with you! Had nothing but issues with my Turbo since taking ownership in Nov 24. Porsche finally acknowledged it had a major safety fault and resolved the majority of the major issues in April 2025 (although it's still buggy as hell), by which time I'd put a deposit down on the new Mercedes GLC Electric in February. I got to test drive one last week once they made it to dealerships from production kicking off in March and am really happy with it as a replacement for the Macan. Sooooo many more gadgets and useful tech than the Macan, for £25k less than the Macan was brand new. Thankfully we bought the Turbo outright so other than taking a hit on the depreciation, we're at least free to swap it at any time. The Merc should be with me in July or early August and I can't wait! Bye Bye Porsche forever!Never again a Porsche EV.
My particular car sucks and is dangerous, and beyond that I can't accept an EV car where the software is obsolete after 12 months, where the maintenance/repair costs are so expensive, where the rare software updates change the BMS/SoC behavior in a wrong way.
1% loss of SoC per day is not normal, it's an electronic and ecological aberration, it's not a feature.
But I'm not going back to ICE!
It would be a world record if my unknown new car is worst than a dangerous, not reliable, obsolete and very expensive medium tech brand new macan EV!Good luck - as they say - the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence ........ until you get on the other side of the fence. I owned a GLC 300 - and traded it for a Macan ICE. There is a change in the driving dynamic of a Mercedes SUV vs Porsche SUV. Again - good luck.
All interesting reflections in this video. I do believe that Porsche has a hard road ahead with software especially with anything one would consider Software Defined. His take is more balanced than I expected. He does point out that some manufacturers assume that OTA can replace actual refinement and testing before release. Iām Not a fan of that at all. I also know that there have been lemons (Macans) shipped as some have posted on these forums. Iām not sure that OTA updates would have helped there. Based on my experience and reading this forum for over a year, those sound like pure HW or electronic/electric component issues. Porsche needs to own up and fix those. Iāve been fortunate so far and after the two ārecallā updates, very few issues on a fantastic car. Even his parents overall were very pleased with their experiences if you watched their video. Frankly, given long years of experience with software and software mentality, the culture at Porsche has some hard shifts to make to really get to āsoftware firstā thinking. I do love driving their cars though.This is mainly about the Porsche Macan. I hope Porsche is listening!