- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 760
- Reaction score
- 675
- Location
- Los Angeles, California
- Vehicles
- 2025 Macan EV Turbo
One notable difference between the two charging sessions though is that one was from August and the other from the last day of November. The higher ambient temperatures in August will provide much of the same benefit as pre-conditioning the battery and get you close to the ideal charging temperature range.In support of the above and against previous posters saying preconditioning isn't worth it:
![]()
If the start SOC was the same the difference would be maybe 17 minutes saved? At the cost of 2kWh, 80p. Without preconditioning the ENTIRE charging curve is derated: ideally you pre-condition and plug in at <10% SOC and hit 270kW, failing that plug in at 18% and you get 250kW. Without preconditioning? Lucky to get 160kW. So with the real world example above, thats 19 minutes!
I've observed that even if the battery comes up to temperature during the non-preconditioned charge, the charge rate never recovers and remains on the derated curve.
You only have to look at the pro's like Bjorn Nyland driving 1000km and the fastest way (other than driving an ICE car) is to precondition and ride the >200kW wave up to 50% and then drive on to the next one.
All the more reason for Porsche to give us control - or at the very least - visibility over the preconditioning process while driving. Would be sweet if stopping for >30 minutes to choose to not pre-condition before the charge stop and save ~2kWh.
Two charging sessions from similar low ambient temperatures would be more relevant.
Sponsored